TTG is reader-supported. When you buy via links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission at no cost to you.
Last Updated on
“Is eating in really that much cheaper than eating out?” I thought to myself. “I’ll bet I could get all this at Taco Johns for half the price!”
Then, today, I read this article in the Fiscal Times: Why It’s Cheaper to Dine Out Than Eat In and I felt somewhat validated.
So, is it true?
Well, the article was based on a recent report released by Bank of America Merrill Lynch – so who knows if this is B of A’s way of getting more people to use their credit cards at dining establishments. But they have a few good points.
Realizing that supermarket foods are going up about 6% every year (2.5 times that of restaurant prices) – the trend towards dining out being a cheaper alternative has some validity. While restaurants and the individual consumer are both feeling the effects of rising food prices – restaurants seem more able to weather this by their bulk buying.
The article lists several examples where eating out is cheaper than eating in. Among them:
10oz Ribeye Dinner (includes soup, salad and asparagus)
Total Price: $17.99
Bag Salad: $3.99
Asparagus: $3.99 a bunch
Seafood Alfredo (unlimited salad and breadsticks)
Total Price: $15.50
Fresh Shrimp: $5.33
Bag Salad: $3.99
While we could obviously counter these with other examples for and against – it is something worth noting. The restaurant prices do not take into account tips either – which could skew these results. Neither do they account for what it takes to drive to the grocer and spend the time preparing the meal (time = money).
This week, I am going to put some of this to the test, as I plan to eat out every day and attempt to spend less than $10 (for the week!).
Should be interesting.